The controversy turns on a stream. Cincinnati relies on an endorsement of what it calls an “insurance and related operations” exclusion, which it says removes coverage for bodily injury “for which the insured may be held liable” that results from the “providing or failure to provide” certain professional services. As cited in the policy, those services include “advising, inspecting, reporting or making recommendations in the insured’s capacity as an insurance company, consultant, broker, agent or its representative” and “performing any claims, investigation, adjustment, engineering, inspection, consulting, survey, audit, valuation, actuarial or data processing service for a fee.”
Cincinnati insurance points to an exclusion to avoid $13m fall claim & more related News Here
